Nobody owns the stack
Contracts sit with whoever signed them. Term dates aren't tracked. Auto-renewal fires and the rate resets upward with no negotiation event.
Most owner-operated businesses buy connectivity, voice, cloud and security one panicked decision at a time, from whoever called first. Five years later nobody can name what's on the invoice. We take the whole stack apart, price it against the market, and put it back together on terms you'd be comfortable defending in a diligence room.
Your IT person is judged on uptime, not price. Your CFO can't evaluate an SD-WAN quote. Your carrier rep is compensated on renewal, not fit. That gap is where three to five years of overspend accumulates quietly, and where the contract terms that later cost you at closing get signed.
Contracts sit with whoever signed them. Term dates aren't tracked. Auto-renewal fires and the rate resets upward with no negotiation event.
A single carrier can only sell you what a single carrier sells. You get their answer to your problem, priced at their card rate.
Tooling gets purchased after an incident or a failed insurance questionnaire, at the worst possible time and the worst possible price.
We start with a fixed-scope review. You keep the analysis whether or not you buy anything through us.
We pull 12 months of billing across carriers, cloud, voice, security and software. We build the inventory nobody has: what you own, what it costs, when it renews, and who can cancel it.
Line by line against current market rates and serviceability at your actual addresses. Overlaps, orphaned circuits and services billed for locations you left get flagged here.
A senior practitioner designs what the stack should be, not what's cheapest. Security gaps get sized against your insurance and regulatory requirements. We sequence the moves so nothing breaks.
We run the process across the supplier bench, normalize the quotes into one comparison, and negotiate term, escalators and exit language. If you proceed, we manage the installs and stay on for the life of the contract.
You are hiring the person who reads the contract, not the person who sells it.
We source across a large supplier bench through our technology services distributor, which means the recommendation isn't constrained to one vendor's catalog. Below is where we actually add value, and when to call us.
The area where buying badly is most expensive and hardest to detect. We scope to your actual risk and your actual obligations, then source the delivery model that fits your headcount, rather than selling you a platform you have nobody to run.
The highest-volume overspend category, and the one with the most stranded cost. Multi-site businesses routinely pay for circuits at addresses they no longer occupy and legacy technology at rates that have fallen by half since signing.
Cloud bills grow by accretion. We look at where workloads actually belong, what the egress and commitment structure really costs, and whether your recovery plan has ever been tested against a stated recovery time objective.
For any business where a missed call is a lost job, the phone system is a revenue system. We treat it that way — starting from answer rate and booking conversion, not seat count.
Fleet and field deployments accumulate untracked lines. We reconcile the bill to the roster, then design the connectivity for people who work out of a truck rather than a desk.
We are deliberately narrow here. We work on the operational uses with a countable return — intake, scheduling, documentation, triage — and we scope the data governance before the deployment, not after.
Almost every company we meet has the same gap: no single document listing what technology they own, what it costs, when it renews, and whether it survives a change of control. Everything else we do — sourcing, negotiation, diligence — runs off this one artifact. You keep it whether or not you buy anything.
Every engagement pairs the commercial and contract work with a senior security and infrastructure practitioner who does the technical design and vendor interrogation. You are not being sold to by someone reading a datasheet.
We don't do break-fix, we don't staff a help desk, and we don't hold your admin credentials. We design, source, negotiate and govern — and where you need day-to-day support, we source that too and hold the provider to the agreement we wrote.
Generalist advisors ask what your stack is. We already know roughly what it should be, because we've worked inside these operating models — and in two of these sectors, we've also sat on the transaction side of the table.
This is where our technical background actually lives. Between a graduate degree in bioinformatics, peer-reviewed research, and program and portfolio management inside clinical-stage biotech, we've been on the inside of the systems we're now sourcing — clinical operations, regulated data, and the infrastructure that has to hold up under an audit.
We speak to the CIO about architecture and to the CFO about burn, and we understand why a company going from forty to two hundred people cannot buy infrastructure the way a forty-person company did.
HVAC, plumbing, electrical, mechanical and roofing — the operating model we know best from the transaction side, having advised owners through lower-middle-market exits in this exact category.
These businesses are technology-dependent and technology-underserved at the same time. The phone system, the dispatch software and the truck connectivity are the business, and they're usually the least examined line items on the P&L.
Location count is the multiplier on everything. A $180 per month mistake replicated across thirty sites is a real number, and it compounds every time you open another one.
The work here is standardization: one template for what a location gets, one contract structure, one renewal calendar, one security posture, and a repeatable opening playbook.
For lower-middle-market sponsors, independent sponsors and search funds, technology is either a diligence surprise or a value-creation lever, depending on when you look at it.
We work at deal speed. We're comfortable inside a compressed exclusivity window, and we understand that the deliverable is an adjustment to the model, not a technical report nobody reads.
This is the part of our practice that doesn't exist elsewhere. We came to technology advisory from business brokerage, which means we've watched technology contracts surface at the worst possible moment — during confirmatory diligence, with the buyer holding the pen.
An unassignable five-year agreement with a change-of-control clause isn't an IT problem. It's a retrade.
Twelve months before you go to market, the technology stack is still fully fixable. We build the contract register, unwind auto-renewals that would extend past closing, resolve assignability and change-of-control language while you still have leverage, and close the security gaps that a buyer's questionnaire will otherwise find. Stranded and duplicate spend gets removed — and at a lower-middle-market multiple, recurring cost removed is capitalized rather than counted once.
Inside exclusivity, on the deal's clock. We answer what is contractually committed and for how long, what transfers and what dies at close, what has to be spent in year one that isn't in the model, and whether the security posture is an indemnity risk or an insurability problem. Findings come back quantified and mapped to the purchase agreement — not as a report, as a position.
Day one, nothing can break: email, phones, connectivity and access have to work while ownership changes underneath them. After that, the value shows up — consolidating an add-on onto the platform's contracts, collapsing duplicate vendors, and re-pricing the combined footprint at the volume the platform now commands rather than the volume the target had alone.
Across a hold period, a platform signs dozens of agreements nobody centrally tracks. We maintain the register, own the renewal calendar, run competitive events instead of accepting auto-renewals, and keep the stack in a permanently sale-ready condition — so the next exit doesn't need a cleanup project.
Technology diligence fails when it produces a description of the environment instead of a position on the price. These are the questions that change a number in the model or a clause in the agreement. Anything that doesn't, we leave out.
Because we've priced these businesses. We know which line items a buyer's advisor circles, which add-backs survive scrutiny, and how a five-year term with a termination-for-convenience penalty reads to someone building a purchase price. The savings are worth having. The transferability is worth more.
Every dollar of annualized recurring cost removed pre-sale is capitalized at your multiple, not counted once.
Diligence findings converted into escrow, indemnity or price reduction — before the buyer finds them.
A complete contract register answered in days rather than weeks keeps momentum on your side of the table.
This is the first question every serious buyer asks, so we answer it before it's asked. For technology sourcing, we are compensated by the suppliers, not by you — and the pricing you receive through us is the same pricing you would receive going direct. Frequently it's better, because we're bringing aggregated volume and a competitive process to a negotiation you'd otherwise enter alone.
Audit, design, competitive sourcing and negotiation. No fee to you for the sourcing work.
The agreement is between you and the provider. You hold it, and you can leave.
A percentage of what you actually spend, paid out of the supplier's existing channel budget.
Our compensation continues only while you remain a customer. If you leave, it stops.
Our income depends on you staying. That is the whole alignment argument, and it's the reason we won't put you somewhere you'll want to leave.
Which one fits depends on whether you want an advisor with a commercial interest in the outcome or one paid only by you. Both are legitimate. We'll tell you which we think fits, and we'll work either way.
The default for operating companies. We run the full review and sourcing process, you contract directly with the suppliers, and we stay on for the life of the agreements.
For work where you want no commercial interest attached to the conclusion. Scoped and priced before we start, with no supplier compensation taken on the engagement.
For platforms and multi-site groups where the stack changes continuously and nobody internally owns it. Monthly retainer, defined service level, standing register ownership.
It would, if we didn't disclose it. So: rates vary somewhat between suppliers, and we'll tell you when a recommendation involves a supplier that compensates us differently than the alternative. We also normalize every quote into one comparison you can read yourself, including the options we didn't recommend and why. If you'd rather remove the question entirely, Model B exists for that reason.
You do. The agreement is directly between your company and the supplier. We are not a reseller and we don't sit in the billing path, which means we never become a party you have to unwind in order to change providers. We advocate on your behalf for the life of the agreement — escalations, billing disputes, service issues and renewals — but you own the relationship and you can end ours without touching your services.
Through a technology services distributor, which aggregates supplier agreements, engineering support and back-office infrastructure across a large advisor network. Practically, it means we can put competing carriers, security providers and cloud platforms into the same evaluation without holding hundreds of individual vendor agreements ourselves — and it means we have engineering resources standing behind a recommendation rather than just a price sheet.
Nothing. The review is fixed-scope and you keep the deliverables regardless of what you decide. Some clients take our analysis and renegotiate directly with their incumbent — that's a legitimate outcome, and it happens. We'd rather be the reason you got a better rate than not be in the conversation at all.
Usually not, and we'd rather work alongside them than around them. A good MSP is responsible for keeping systems running; we're responsible for what you're buying and what you signed. Those are different jobs and the second one is rarely anyone's actual assignment. Where we do find a problem with an incumbent provider, you'll hear it from us directly rather than through a recommendation that quietly routes around them.
Roughly two to four hours total across the four weeks, most of it in week one. We need billing access or twelve months of invoices, copies of the contracts you can find, a site list, and one conversation with whoever knows the environment. We don't need admin credentials, we don't need to be on your network, and we don't need standing meetings.
Trust Anchor Partners is deliberately small. The person who runs your engagement is the person you met, and the technical work is done by a senior practitioner rather than delegated to a junior with a template. We take a limited number of engagements at a time, and we say no to the ones we're not the right firm for.
The name is borrowed from cryptography. A trust anchor is the reference point everything else derives its validity from — the thing you check against when you need to know whether to believe a claim. That's the job.
The commercial side of the practice is led by an MBA-trained operator with a background spanning capital markets, biotech program and portfolio management, and lower-middle-market M&A. The unusual combination — a graduate science degree, time inside clinical-stage biotech operations, and hands-on transaction work advising owner-operators through exits — is what makes the technology-in-a-transaction thesis something we can execute rather than just describe.
That background also shapes how we work: the deliverable is always a number that shows up somewhere, in the operating budget or in the model.
Engagements are staffed with a senior cybersecurity and infrastructure practitioner with enterprise production experience — the person who designs the target state, interrogates the vendors, and reads what the service level actually commits to underneath the marketing.
This is the reason we can push back on a supplier's engineer instead of nodding through the deck. A commercial advisor alone can negotiate price. Getting the architecture right requires someone who has run one.
Every quote we collect, including the ones we didn't recommend, normalized so you can compare them yourself. You should be able to reach a different conclusion than we did.
Where we're compensated by a supplier, you know before you decide. Where you'd rather we weren't, we'll work on a fee instead.
Sourcing is the beginning. Installation, escalation, billing accuracy and renewal are where an advisor is actually worth having.
The fastest way in is a short call. If you'd rather write first, send one recent invoice and we'll tell you within a day whether there's anything here worth pursuing.
None of this is required, but the conversation is materially better if you have it handy:
Thirty minutes to see whether there's anything here worth doing. Bring one recent invoice if you have it handy — we can usually tell within that call whether the opportunity is material enough to justify the engagement, and we'll tell you if it isn't.